The cross-lagged model holds equally for intervention and control groups and for boys and girls¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Constraining structural paths across intervention/control groups (ΔCFI = .003) and across boys and girls (ΔCFI = .002) did not significantly change model fit. → Xia 2016
Evidence¶
Xia 2016¶
Xia, M., Fosco, G. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). Examining Reciprocal Influences Among Family Climate, School Attachment, and Academic Self-Regulation: Implications for School Success. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 442-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000141
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple-group invariance tests in the longitudinal SEM compared constrained and freely estimated models; the intervention/control comparison yielded "negligible change in overall model fit (ΔCFI =.003)", and the boys/girls comparison ΔCFI = .002, both below the .01 criterion.
"Constraining paths to be equal across the intervention and control groups resulted in negligible change in overall model fit (ΔCFI =.003), indicating that the pattern of associations among the variables was consistent across groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Family climate and school attachment exert reciprocal positive influences on each other over the middle school years — related
- Measurement invariance across gender is supported, but full structural equivalence is rejected, with differences localized to transformational-leadership paths — related
- The mutualism model's coupling structure held equally across sexes and age did not directly predict change scores — related
- The achievement goal model's pattern of results holds for both younger and older adult age groups — related
- The same cognitive processes account for variability in arithmetic skills in children at family-risk of dyslexia and typically developing controls — related
- Boys and girls do not differ in the type of mental models of the day and night cycle they hold — related
- The temporal asymmetry holds across gender and initial ability levels, with a cautious gender difference in the French lagged effect — related
- The ANCOVA and CHANGE models can be transformed into one another, so empirical model fit is no criterion for choosing between them — related
- No sex difference in the effect of drill on arithmetic improvement — related
- Retention effects are developmentally invariant across students retained in Years 5, 6, 7, and 8, and mostly positive overall — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
model-invariance-gender-and-intervention-groups |
title |
The cross-lagged model holds equally for intervention and control groups and for boys and girls |
description |
The cross-lagged model holds equally for intervention and control groups and for boys and girls |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — xia-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.