The serial indirect effect of AI literacy on continued use is weaker at higher levels of AI anxiety (moderated mediation)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The index of moderated mediation for the serial pathway is negative and significant (−0.03, 95% CI −0.05 to −0.02), so the indirect association is progressively weaker at higher anxiety. → Peichen Hu 2026
Evidence¶
Peichen Hu 2026¶
Peichen Hu. (2026). Psychological predictors of continued ChatGPT use among university students: the roles of AI literacy, trust, and academic self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 17:1900190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1900190
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Index of moderated mediation with Monte Carlo confidence intervals (20,000 draws) in the SEM of 450 existing ChatGPT users; printed estimate "[−0.03, 95% CI (−0.05, −0.02)]". Table 3 notes that its estimates, this index included, are standardised; the index is a change in a standardised indirect effect per unit of anxiety rather than a group difference, so it is not coded on the impact scale.
"The index of moderated mediation for the serial pathway was negative and significant [−0.03, 95% CI (−0.05, −0.02)], indicating that the indirect association of AI literacy with continued use through trust and self-efficacy was progressively weaker at higher levels of anxiety."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Affect Regulation — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
- Academic Anxiety — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- AI literacy is directly and positively associated with continued ChatGPT use among existing users — related
- Trust in AI and academic self-efficacy serially mediate the literacy-to-continued-use association (literacy → trust → self-efficacy → use) — related
- Self-efficacy and learning motivation serially mediate the link from AIGC affordance to self-regulated learning — related
- Structural paths are stable when continued-use intention and current use are modeled as separate outcomes, and AI anxiety is not directly related to continued use — related
- Learning agency and challenge emotions serially mediate the association between GenAI literacy and GenAI-assisted self-regulated learning behaviors — related
- Indirect paths through AI learning self-efficacy and perceived usefulness account for about 69.5% of the total association between school support and AI learning anxiety — related
- The Monte Carlo power analysis indicates limited statistical power for several hypothesised direct and indirect effects — related
- Perceived AI literacy does not moderate the indirect warmth and competence pathways from GenAI use to trust — related
- Challenge emotions mediate the association between GenAI literacy and GenAI-assisted self-regulated learning behaviors, with a relatively small indirect effect — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
moderated-mediation-anxiety-serial-path |
title |
The serial indirect effect of AI literacy on continued use is weaker at higher levels of AI anxiety (moderated mediation) |
description |
The serial indirect effect of AI literacy on continued use is weaker at higher levels of AI anxiety (moderated mediation) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — peichen-hu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.