Most module users reviewed the module before entering clinic¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? 62.5% of students who used the module reported reviewing it prior to entering clinic. → Tsao and Park 2016
Evidence¶
Tsao and Park 2016¶
Ariel Tsao, Sang E. Park. (2016). The Role of Online Learning in Radiographic Diagnosis in Dental Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1387
q1 · i? · associational · r1
Self-reported usage from the de-identified survey of the 16 module users in the pilot study; a descriptive percentage with no test statistic or effect size printed.
"62.5% of the students who used the module reported reviewing the module prior to entering clinic."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who used the module reported positive perceptions and supported its curricular implementation with modifications — related
- Accessing the online caries diagnosis module did not significantly improve dental students' radiographic diagnostic accuracy — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.