Claims

Students who used the module reported positive perceptions and supported its curricular implementation with modifications

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Of the 16 module users surveyed, a majority agreed or strongly agreed the module was more effective than reviewing lecture slides and that it should be instituted in the curriculum. → Tsao and Park 2016

Evidence

Tsao and Park 2016

Ariel Tsao, Sang E. Park. (2016). The Role of Online Learning in Radiographic Diagnosis in Dental Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.1387

q1 · i? · associational · r1

Survey of the 16 students who used the module; Table 4 shows 62.5% agreed or strongly agreed it was more effective than reviewing lecture slides and 68.8% supported curricular institution. The article reports "a positive p erception of the module"; perceptions only, no effect size printed.

"As shown in Table 4, in general, students reported a positive p erception of the module and support its implementation with modifications in the curriculum."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.