Mood-related measures (contentedness, smiling, fidgetiness) did not vary systematically across the reliable and unreliable conditions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Analyses of apparent contentedness, smiling time, and fidgetiness found no systematic differences between conditions, arguing against a mood-based explanation of the wait-time effect. → Kidd 2013
Evidence¶
Kidd 2013¶
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children's decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Supplementary analysis (Appendix A.3) of the same experiment: two naïve coders rated contentedness (1-9 scale), smiling time, and script-quantified fidgetiness from the first 30 s of waiting. The article reports the variables "did not vary systematically across the two conditions"; no test statistics or effect sizes are printed in the provided text.
"Since these results might alternatively be explained by a difference in mood across the two groups (e.g., by differently induced levels of either frustration or excitement), an analysis of the three relevant measures—apparent contentedness, smiling, and fidgetiness—was conducted (see Appendix A.3). Results suggested that these variables did not vary systematically across the two conditions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In adults with ADHD, acute cardio exercise does not improve sustained attention but enhances mood and motivation — related
- Unreliability in an outcome measure reduces the statistical power of treatment-control comparisons — related
- Children in the reliable condition were significantly more likely to wait the full 15 min than children in the unreliable condition (64.3% vs 7.1%) — related
- Children in the reliable condition waited significantly longer on the marshmallow task than children in the unreliable condition (p < 0.0005) — related
- Age and gender did not significantly predict marshmallow-task wait-times in this sample when controlling for condition — related
- Children's wait-times on sustained delay-of-gratification tasks reflect beliefs about environmental reliability in addition to self-control capacity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mood-measures-did-not-vary-across-conditions |
title |
Mood-related measures (contentedness, smiling, fidgetiness) did not vary systematically across the reliable and unreliable conditions |
description |
Mood-related measures (contentedness, smiling, fidgetiness) did not vary systematically across the reliable and unreliable conditions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kidd-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.