Children in the reliable condition waited significantly longer on the marshmallow task than children in the unreliable condition (p < 0.0005)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Children who first observed a reliable experimenter waited a mean of 722.43 s versus 181.57 s for children who observed an unreliable experimenter, a highly significant difference. → Kidd 2013
Evidence¶
Kidd 2013¶
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children's decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Randomized experiment with 28 children (ages 3;6-5;10) assigned to reliable or unreliable experimenter conditions before the marshmallow task. The unreliable group's mean wait was "M = 181.57 s" versus 722.43 s; Wilcoxon rank-sum W = 22.5, p < 0.0005. No effect size is printed.
"Children in the unreliable condition waited without eating the marshmallow for a mean duration of 3 min and 2 s (M = 181.57 s). In contrast, children in the reliable condition waited 12 min and 2 s (M = 722.43 s). A Wilcoxon rank-sum test (also known as a Mann–Whitney Wilcoxon or a Mann–Whitney U) confirmed that this difference was highly significant (W = 22.5, p < 0.0005)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Age and gender did not significantly predict marshmallow-task wait-times in this sample when controlling for condition — related
- Children in the reliable condition were significantly more likely to wait the full 15 min than children in the unreliable condition (64.3% vs 7.1%) — related
- Children's wait-times on sustained delay-of-gratification tasks reflect beliefs about environmental reliability in addition to self-control capacity — a broader claim this one bears on
- Mood-related measures (contentedness, smiling, fidgetiness) did not vary systematically across the reliable and unreliable conditions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reliable-condition-longer-marshmallow-wait-times |
title |
Children in the reliable condition waited significantly longer on the marshmallow task than children in the unreliable condition (p < 0.0005) |
description |
Children in the reliable condition waited significantly longer on the marshmallow task than children in the unreliable condition (p < 0.0005) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kidd-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.