Claims

Twelfth-grade students taught Access databases with Moodle-based educational software obtained significantly higher final-test grades than a comparable control class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At the final test, the experimental group's mean grade (7.909091) exceeded the control group's (6.958333), a difference the authors report as statistically significant at P = 0.03. → Magdaş and Bontea 2011

Evidence

Magdaş and Bontea 2011

Ioana Magdaş, Timea Bontea. (2011). Developing digital competences using an educational software. A pedagogical research. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Volume 4, Number 4, ISSN 2065-1430. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056072

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment comparing two XII-grade classes at a technical college (experimental n=22, control n=24) on a common complex final Access task. Table 25 prints means of 7,909091 vs 6,958333; the authors report "statistically significant at P = 0.03" from the t-test in Table 26.

"We observe that the value of t Stat calculated is greater than the value of t corresponding to P = 0.05 significance threshold even higher than P = 0.027928. From this we conclude that the difference between the two areas is statistically significant at P = 0.03 significance threshold."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.