Higher and lower Moodle scorers viewed flipped learning as almost equally valuable, but higher scorers talked more positively about how the course was delivered¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Learners with higher and lower Moodle scores rated the value of the flipped learning model almost equally. → Bakla A 2018 q2 i? Higher scorers talked more positively than lower scorers about how the course was delivered in follow-up interviews. → Bakla A 2018

Evidence¶

Bakla A 2018¶

Bakla A. (2018). Learner-generated materials in a flipped pronunciation class: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 125, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.017

q2 · i? · design · r2

Follow-up interviews with 8 participants in the study's explanatory qualitative phase revealed this divergence: equal perceived value of flipped learning across Moodle-score groups, but "the higher scorers talked more positively about how the course was delivered."

"the higher and lower scorers (Moodle Scores) viewed the flipped learning model almost equally valuable, the higher scorers talked more positively about how the course was delivered"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learners reported mostly positive attitudes toward flipped learning in the learner-generated-materials pronunciation course — related
• Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach — related