Claims

Learners reported mostly positive attitudes toward flipped learning in the learner-generated-materials pronunciation course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants reported mostly positive attitudes toward the flipped learning model. → Bakla A 2018

Evidence

Bakla A 2018

Bakla A. (2018). Learner-generated materials in a flipped pronunciation class: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 125, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.017

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-instruction survey of 40 intermediate Turkish learners of English in a flipped pronunciation class; the study reports that "the learners reported mostly positive attitudes" toward flipped learning. No effect size is printed.

"although the learners reported mostly positive attitudes and that the higher and lower scorers (Moodle Scores) viewed the flipped learning model almost equally valuable"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.