Multi-state model parameters do not differ between Norwegian and Japanese groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Best-fit learning rate and retention parameters of both fast and slow processes showed no significant group differences in the multi-state model fit. → Yamada 2025

Evidence¶

Yamada 2025¶

Yamada, C., Itaguchi, Y., & Rodríguez-Aranda, C. (2025). Unconscious cultural cognitive biases in explicit processes of visuomotor adaptation. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00335-0

q2 · i? · associational · r1

An exploratory model fit to the adaptation data of both groups found "no signi ficant differences between the Norwegian and Japanese groups in any of the parameter values"; printed fast-process learning rates were 0.25 (Norwegian) and 0.36 (Japanese), retention 0.53 and 0.63, slow-process rates 0.03 and 0.04.

"We fit the data to the multi-state model 37 and showed that there were no signi ficant differences between the Norwegian and Japanese groups in any of the parameter values"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Japanese participants show larger explicit aim than Norwegian participants during visuomotor adaptation — related
• Implicit motor learning measures do not differ between Norwegian and Japanese groups — related
• Implicit learning measures from verbal reports do not correlate with aftereffects or slow-process learning rates — related
• Japanese participants change their aiming direction more frequently than Norwegian participants, regardless of previous hit or miss — related
• Japanese participants change aiming direction frequently even after successfully hitting the target — related
• Faster rate of learning may be negatively related to long-term retention (efficiency-effectiveness trade-off) — related