Claims

Multimedia presentation effects are strongest for procedural knowledge (technical and contextual)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Watching the presentation raised the probability of correctly answering technical and contextual knowledge questions by about 20 points. → Tani 2022

Evidence

Tani 2022

Tani, M., Manuguerra, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Can videos affect learning outcomes? Evidence from an actual learning environment. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Model 3 contrast analysis stratified by knowledge type and number of correct questions. Contrasts for viewers versus identical non-viewers were "0.201 (.007)" for technical and "0.246 (.026)" for contextual knowledge.

"Watching the multimedia presentation raised the probability of correctly answering these test questions by about 20 points (from about 65/100 to about 84/100)—a large effect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id multimedia-strongest-effect-procedural-knowledge
title Multimedia presentation effects are strongest for procedural knowledge (technical and contextual)
description Multimedia presentation effects are strongest for procedural knowledge (technical and contextual)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tani-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.