Risk of dropout is especially high when an adolescent's network includes more than one type of same-age intimate who recently dropped out¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2–q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Dropout among two or more types of same-age intimates carried a particularly large adjusted OR (4.88, 95% CI 2.54-12.5), almost twice the OR for dropout among only one type (2.53). → Dupéré 2021
Evidence¶
Dupéré 2021¶
Dupéré, V., Dion, E., Cantin, S., Archambault, I., & Lacourse, E. (2021). Social contagion and high school dropout: The role of friends, romantic partners, and siblings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 572-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000484
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Model 3 of the logistic regressions on cases and matched controls (n = 366) tested cumulative exposure. The OR for two or more intimate types "was particularly large — almost twice the OR estimated for the occurrence of dropout in only one type of intimate (4.88/2.53 = 1.93)"; the abstract reports OR = 4.88, 95% CI 2.54-12.5.
"the OR for the occurrences of dropout among two types of intimates or more was particularly large — almost twice the OR estimated for the occurrence of dropout in only one type of intimate (4.88/2.53 = 1.93) — although both were significantly associated with dropout"
Dupéré 2021 (2)¶
Dupéré, V., Dion, E., Cantin, S., Archambault, I., & Lacourse, E. (2021). Social contagion and high school dropout: The role of friends, romantic partners, and siblings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 572-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000484
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Bivariate comparisons (Table 2) without confounder control showed the same pattern descriptively: "dropout cases were 2.6 times (19.7% / 7.7%) more likely than matched controls to report occurrences of dropout for two or more types of same-age intimates".
"dropout cases were 2.6 times (19.7% / 7.7%) more likely than matched controls to report occurrences of dropout for two or more types of same-age intimates"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only recent (within the past year) occurrences of dropout in an adolescent's network are associated with the adolescent's own dropout; older occurrences are not — a broader claim this one bears on
- Dropout among friends, romantic partners, and siblings each shows an independent association with an adolescent's own dropout — related
- Adolescents are at greater risk of dropping out when at least one same-age intimate (friend, romantic partner, or sibling) has recently dropped out of school — a broader claim this one bears on
- The association between network dropout and adolescents' own dropout does not significantly differ by gender or by regular versus special education sector — related
- The main dropout-contagion findings remained essentially unchanged across five robustness checks including unmatched samples, IPTW, and conditional regression — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multiple-dropout-intimates-cumulative-risk |
title |
Risk of dropout is especially high when an adolescent's network includes more than one type of same-age intimate who recently dropped out |
description |
Risk of dropout is especially high when an adolescent's network includes more than one type of same-age intimate who recently dropped out |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — dupéré-2021, dupéré-2021-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.