Claims

The main dropout-contagion findings remained essentially unchanged across five robustness checks including unmatched samples, IPTW, and conditional regression

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Rerunning the regression models on the full sample including unmatched controls and on exposures after the risk index yielded stronger effect sizes, consistent with matching yielding conservative estimates. → Dupéré 2021 q2 i? Rerunning the models with risk-index items as separate variables, with IPTW, and with conditional logistic regression left the main findings essentially unaffected. → Dupéré 2021 (2)

Evidence

Dupéré 2021

Dupéré, V., Dion, E., Cantin, S., Archambault, I., & Lacourse, E. (2021). Social contagion and high school dropout: The role of friends, romantic partners, and siblings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 572-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000484

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Robustness tests reran the regressions on the full sample (N = 545) including unmatched controls, and on exposures occurring after administration of the risk index to probe reverse causality. The article reports "the effect sizes and significance levels tended to be stronger, a result consistent with scholarship showing that matching tends to yield conservative estimates".

"In both tests, the effect sizes and significance levels tended to be stronger, a result consistent with scholarship showing that matching tends to yield conservative estimates"

Dupéré 2021 (2)

Dupéré, V., Dion, E., Cantin, S., Archambault, I., & Lacourse, E. (2021). Social contagion and high school dropout: The role of friends, romantic partners, and siblings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 572-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000484

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Alternative confounder-handling specifications — risk-index items entered separately and inverse probability of treatment weighting, after which exposed and non-exposed participants were successfully rebalanced — left the main findings stable; conditional logistic regression also left "the main findings were essentially unaffected".

"With both tests, the main findings were essentially unaffected."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id robustness-checks-support-dropout-contagion-findings
title The main dropout-contagion findings remained essentially unchanged across five robustness checks including unmatched samples, IPTW, and conditional regression
description The main dropout-contagion findings remained essentially unchanged across five robustness checks including unmatched samples, IPTW, and conditional regression
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — dupéré-2021, dupéré-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.