Selecting appropriate digital technologies is the only ERT digital competence explicitly reflected in all ten Australian university frameworks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The normative statement on selecting appropriate digital technologies aligned with all ten reviewed university frameworks. → Henry Cook 2023
Evidence¶
Henry Cook 2023¶
Henry Cook, Tiffani Apps, Karley Beckman, Sue Bennett. (2023). Digital competence for emergency remote teaching in higher education: understanding the present and anticipating the future. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10194-4
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Document analysis in Phase 2 applied the conceptual frame to ten Australian university teaching and digital capability frameworks. The authors report that "The selection of digital technologies in teaching and learning was present in all ten frameworks," covering purposes such as facilitating collaboration, flexible learning, and assessment.
"The selection of digital technologies in teaching and learning was present in all ten frameworks. Statements of competency within these frameworks focused on teachers' selecting digital technologies suitable for specific pedagogies or student needs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only one of ten university frameworks explicitly refers to transferring and adapting digital practice as a competence — related
- During ERT, teachers selected technologies based on familiarity, availability, functionality, and technical competence — related
- Accommodating technical challenges appears only in digital capability frameworks, not teaching capability frameworks — related
- Assessing the time demand and value of digital technology integration is evidenced in only three of ten university frameworks — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
n1-selection-present-all-ten-frameworks |
title |
Selecting appropriate digital technologies is the only ERT digital competence explicitly reflected in all ten Australian university frameworks |
description |
Selecting appropriate digital technologies is the only ERT digital competence explicitly reflected in all ten Australian university frameworks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — henry-cook-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.