Only one of ten university frameworks explicitly refers to transferring and adapting digital practice as a competence¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Seven frameworks addressed transferability, but only one explicitly referred to teachers transferring and adapting digital practice; the other six made general references to pedagogical skill transfer. → Henry Cook 2023

Evidence¶

Henry Cook 2023¶

Henry Cook, Tiffani Apps, Karley Beckman, Sue Bennett. (2023). Digital competence for emergency remote teaching in higher education: understanding the present and anticipating the future. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10194-4

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Phase 2 document analysis found seven frameworks detailed competencies aligned with transferability across teaching modes or contexts. The authors report that "only one university framework explicitly referred to teachers' transferring and adapting digital practice as a competence," with the rest framed generally.

"Yet, only one university framework explicitly referred to teachers' transferring and adapting digital practice as a competence. The other six frameworks made more general references to the transfer of pedagogical skill and knowledge across a range of contexts."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Selecting appropriate digital technologies is the only ERT digital competence explicitly reflected in all ten Australian university frameworks — related
• Educator-focused digital literacy frameworks prioritize pedagogy, empowering learners, and curriculum and assessment, with more evenly distributed categories — related
• Assessing the time demand and value of digital technology integration is evidenced in only three of ten university frameworks — related