Claims

A 6-week NCLEX Coaching Model showed no significant first-time pass-rate improvement but significantly improved confidence/readiness scores (Schlairet & Rubenstein, 2019)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A pilot cohort study of the NCLEX Coaching Model found a mild improvement in first-time passing rate from 89% (n = 101) to 90% (n = 107), which was not statistically significant. → Almasloukh 2023 q2 i? Statistically significant (p < 0.001, n = 114) improvements in confidence/readiness scores were found after the intervention compared to before. → Almasloukh 2023

Evidence

Almasloukh 2023

Almasloukh, K. B., Miner, M., Phillips, K., & Evans, M. (2023). Educational strategies and nursing theory to prepare leaners for NCLEX‐RN. Nursing Open, 10, 7144–7153. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1998

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Schlairet and Rubenstein's (2019) 6-week pilot cohort study in the last semester testing the NCLEX Coaching Model; passing rate moved from 89% (n = 101) to 90% (n = 107) without significance, while "improvements in confidence/readiness scores" were significant (p < 0.001, n = 114).

"the authors found statistically significant (p < 0.001, n = 114) improvements in confidence/readiness scores after the completion of the intervention when compared to before starting the intervention."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.