Claims

Scoping review of 25 studies finds multiple educational strategies for NCLEX-RN preparation with no consensus on a best practice, active learning being the most frequent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 25 reviewed studies, multiple educational strategies are used to prepare students for the NCLEX-RN exam, but there was not a consensus on a best practice. → Almasloukh 2023 q2 i? Active learning strategies were the most frequent educational strategy (n = 11), followed by faculty coaching/support (n = 6), NCLEX-RN-style question exposure (n = 5), review courses/products (n = 4), remediation/tutoring (n = 3), and simulation (n = 2). → Almasloukh 2023

Evidence

Almasloukh 2023

Almasloukh, K. B., Miner, M., Phillips, K., & Evans, M. (2023). Educational strategies and nursing theory to prepare leaners for NCLEX‐RN. Nursing Open, 10, 7144–7153. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1998

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR, searching CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO and Web of Science (2015–2022); 25 studies were charted. The review reports "there was not a consensus on a best practice" and counts active learning as the most frequent strategy (n = 11).

"Studies (N = 25) revealed that multiple educational strategies are used to prepare students for the NCLEX‐RN exam; however, there was not a consensus on a best practice."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.