Grade 8 students using NGSS-oriented learning tools scored higher on developing-and-using-models skill than students using the teacher's learning tools¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In a quasi-experiment with one experimental and one control group, the experimental class averaged 3.69 on the developing-and-using-models skill observation sheet versus 1.58 in the control class. → Rachmawati 2019

Evidence¶

Rachmawati 2019¶

Rachmawati, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Next Generation Science Standard in Science Learning to Improve Student's Practice Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12120a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment at SMP Negeri 1 Wates with one experimental and one control group; skill was rated by an observer using an observation sheet during learning. The experimental class scored 3.69 (very good) and the control class 1.58; the article reports "a score of 1.58, which was low" for controls. No effect size or significance test is printed.

"The control class had a score of 1.58, which was low, meaning that the practical skills of experimental class students using NGSS-oriented learning tools were higher than those of the control class that used the teacher's learning tools instead of NGSS-oriented learning tools."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two-stage expert validation raised the NGSS-oriented lesson plan assessment from 3.65 to 3.82, deeming it feasible — related
• Two-stage revision raised the NGSS worksheet validation score from 2.6 (not yet feasible) to 3.36 (very good) — related