Two-stage revision raised the NGSS worksheet validation score from 2.6 (not yet feasible) to 3.36 (very good)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The worksheet's stage-1 score of 2.6 was judged not yet feasible; after revisions to images, language, title, colour, and font, stage 2 scored 3.36. → Rachmawati 2019

Evidence¶

Rachmawati 2019¶

Rachmawati, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Next Generation Science Standard in Science Learning to Improve Student's Practice Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12120a

q2 · i? · design · r3

Validator assessment of the NGSS-oriented worksheet by expert lecturers and science teachers in two stages. Stage 1 scored 2.6, below the >3.0 feasibility threshold; the article reports the stage-2 result "obtained a score of 3.36 which was very good". Descriptive scores only.

"Based on Table 4, the validation score of stage 1 of the developed worksheet obtained a score of 2.6, which is good. This means that the developed worksheet is not yet feasible for use."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The developing-and-using-models skill observation sheet was validated as feasible after two revision stages — related
• Two-stage expert validation raised the NGSS-oriented lesson plan assessment from 3.65 to 3.82, deeming it feasible — related
• Grade 8 students using NGSS-oriented learning tools scored higher on developing-and-using-models skill than students using the teacher's learning tools — related
• Preliminary field testing with nine students of mixed ability rated the NGSS worksheet 3.22, indicating it could be understood across ability levels — related