Claims

Two-stage expert validation raised the NGSS-oriented lesson plan assessment from 3.65 to 3.82, deeming it feasible

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After revisions addressing objectives, media listing, skill elements, and subject-appropriateness, the lesson plan's second-stage validation score reached 3.82 (very good), above the >3.0 feasibility threshold. → Rachmawati 2019

Evidence

Rachmawati 2019

Rachmawati, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Next Generation Science Standard in Science Learning to Improve Student's Practice Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12120a

q2 · i? · design · r3

Validation study of the developed lesson plan by two expert lecturers and one science teacher across two stages; stage 1 scored 3.65, requiring revisions, and stage 2 scored 3.82, exceeding the article's >3.0 feasibility criterion. Descriptive scores only; no inferential test.

"The second stage validation result obtained a score of 3.82 which was very good. The results of the lesson plan assessment at this stage have shown that the NGSS-oriented lesson plan is suitable for use in science learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.