Preliminary field testing with nine students of mixed ability rated the NGSS worksheet 3.22, indicating it could be understood across ability levels¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Nine randomly selected grade VIII students of high, medium, and low ability assessed four worksheet aspects, averaging 3.22 (very good). → Rachmawati 2019

Evidence¶

Rachmawati 2019¶

Rachmawati, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Next Generation Science Standard in Science Learning to Improve Student's Practice Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12120a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Preliminary field testing involving nine grade VIII students (three high-ability, two medium, three low) selected by teacher input. Aspects covered layout, images, tables, questions, and language; the average of "the four aspects was 3.22". Student suggestions informed phase-2 revisions.

"The average score of the four aspects was 3.22, a good score, meaning that the NGSS worksheet could be understood by low, middle, or high-ability students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two-stage revision raised the NGSS worksheet validation score from 2.6 (not yet feasible) to 3.36 (very good) — related
• A limited group of six students rated the media 94.4% overall, categorized as very valid — related