The three groups were equivalent in self-regulated and self-directed learning scores before treatment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Kruskal-Wallis tests found no significant pre-test differences among the groups on either scale. → Uz 2018
Evidence¶
Uz 2018¶
Uz, R., & Uzun, A. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877-886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pre-test comparisons on 167 students: self-regulated learning gave chi-square = 1.134, p = .567 and self-directed learning gave chi-square = 4.134, p = .127; the article reports "no significant difference between the self -directed learning pre -test scores" either, so groups started equal.
"The self-regulated learning pre-test scores of the experimental and the control groups did not differ significantly (Table 2)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The three groups did not differ in prior achievement before the Force and Motion intervention — related
- The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention — related
- At the beginning of the experiment the experimental and control groups showed no significant differences in integrative collaboration — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.