Claims

The three groups were equivalent in self-regulated and self-directed learning scores before treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Kruskal-Wallis tests found no significant pre-test differences among the groups on either scale. → Uz 2018

Evidence

Uz 2018

Uz, R., & Uzun, A. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 877-886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-test comparisons on 167 students: self-regulated learning gave chi-square = 1.134, p = .567 and self-directed learning gave chi-square = 4.134, p = .127; the article reports "no significant difference between the self -directed learning pre -test scores" either, so groups started equal.

"The self-regulated learning pre-test scores of the experimental and the control groups did not differ significantly (Table 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.