Claims

No school-based intervention model for students already using substances was found: all examined models were preventive or protective in approach

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the 43 studies reviewed, every school-based intervention examined was preventive or protective; none was corrective in approach, leaving students already using substances unmapped. → Bajpai Tewari 2026

Evidence

Bajpai Tewari 2026

Bajpai Tewari, D., Gautam, U., Jaiswal, V., Pooja, Mishra, A., & Das, P. (2026). Integrated Education Models for Addressing Substance Use Among Schoolchildren: A Scoping Review of School-Based Educational Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23081073

q2 · i? · review · r2

Results statement of the scoping review (Abstract/Results synthesis) covering the 43 included studies identified through SCOPUS and Web of Science searches to December 2025. The review reports "there was no school-based intervention model that was corrective in its approach." This is a descriptive gap finding, not an effect estimate.

"All school-based interventions examined were preventive or protective in their approaches. There was no school-based intervention model that was corrective in its approach."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.