Claims

School-only substance use interventions such as HeadOn and SUPEP improved knowledge and attitudes without corresponding behavioural change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interventions confined to students and school administration improved knowledge and attitudes but did not produce behavioural change in substance use. → Bajpai Tewari 2026

Evidence

Bajpai Tewari 2026

Bajpai Tewari, D., Gautam, U., Jaiswal, V., Pooja, Mishra, A., & Das, P. (2026). Integrated Education Models for Addressing Substance Use Among Schoolchildren: A Scoping Review of School-Based Educational Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23081073

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative comparison in Section 3.2.2 of models whose participants were limited to school administration, students and teachers. The review reports that HeadOn and SUPEP "improved knowledge and attitudes without corresponding behavioural change." No effect sizes are printed.

"school-only models like HeadOn [93] and SUPEP [88] improved knowledge and attitudes without corresponding behavioural change."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.