Claims

School-based substance use interventions with an explicit theoretical foundation are associated with more robust outcomes than atheorised models, which more often showed fluctuating outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In this scoping review, models grounded in explicit theory (e.g., Social Cognitive Theory, Social Development Model) consistently improved targeted cognitive and behavioural outcomes, while thirteen of sixteen atheorised models showed fluctuating outcomes. → Bajpai Tewari 2026

Evidence

Bajpai Tewari 2026

Bajpai Tewari, D., Gautam, U., Jaiswal, V., Pooja, Mishra, A., & Das, P. (2026). Integrated Education Models for Addressing Substance Use Among Schoolchildren: A Scoping Review of School-Based Educational Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23081073

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis (Section 3.2.1) of the scoping review's 43 included studies, comparing theorised and atheorised models. The review reports that "an explicit theoretical foundation in intervention was found to be associated with more robust outcomes," citing Social Cognitive Theory-grounded models as improving refusal self-efficacy and reduced substance use risk. No effect size is printed.

"An explicit theoretical foundation in intervention was found to be associated with more robust outcomes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.