No cross-lag effects were observed between racial discrimination and private regard in the full sample¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In the full-sample SEM model, private regard and discrimination showed significant stability but no cross-lag effects. → Seaton Eleanor K. 2009

Evidence¶

Seaton Eleanor K. 2009¶

Seaton Eleanor K., Yip Tiffany, Sellers Robert M. (2009). A Longitudinal Examination of Racial Identity and Racial Discrimination Among African American Adolescents. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01268.x

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Longitudinal SEM of the full three-wave sample testing private regard and discrimination; stability was significant for both constructs across adjacent waves, but the article reports "no cross-lag effects were observed". The age-nested analysis qualifies this null for late adolescents.

"The fit for this model was good according to various fit indices (χ2 = 26.33, df = 6, χ2/df = 4.39, TLI = .81, CFI = .92, RMSEA = .13). Again, no cross-lag effects were observed."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Identity — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Age moderates the discrimination–private regard relation: discrimination at Time 2 predicts lower private regard at Time 3 among late (17–18) but not middle adolescents — reports the opposite
• Perceived racial discrimination at Time 1 is negatively linked to public regard at Time 2 among African American adolescents — related
• No cross-lag effects were observed between racial discrimination and racial centrality over three years — related
• Public regard decreased linearly over time while reported discrimination dipped at Time 2 and rose again at Time 3 — related
• Perceived discrimination is negatively related to later public regard, and low public regard buffers discrimination's impact on adjustment — related