No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the analysis stage of formative research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Achievements in the analysis stage were independent of learning environment (t=0.29, p>.05). → Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017

Evidence¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa, Francisca-José Serrano-Pastor, María-José Martínez-Segura. (2017). Formative Research in Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments in Higher Education. Comunicar, 51, XXV. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-01

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Inter-group comparison at the final (analysis) stage of the quasi-experiment; the mean difference was the smallest observed (x3e-x3u=0.31). The article reports "no significant differences between the two groups"; equivalence was not tested.

"The comparison of means between the E-learning and U-learning groups through the Student's T test evidences that there are no significant differences between the two groups (t=0.29 y p>.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the referencing stage of formative research — related
• Students using a U-learning environment significantly outperform E-learning students on systematization of pedagogical experiences in formative research training — related