No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the referencing stage of formative research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Both groups improved referencing activities regardless of learning environment; the difference was not statistically significant (t=-0.42, p>.05). → Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017

Evidence¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa, Francisca-José Serrano-Pastor, María-José Martínez-Segura. (2017). Formative Research in Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments in Higher Education. Comunicar, 51, XXV. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-01

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Inter-group comparison at stage 1 of the quasi-experiment (means x1ee=42.19 versus x1u=41.85). The article reports "no statistically significant differences in the referencing stage"; equivalence was not tested.

"showing that there are no statistically significant differences in the referencing stage between the two groups that interact in E-learning and U-learning environments (t=–0.42; p>.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the analysis stage of formative research — related
• Students using a U-learning environment significantly outperform E-learning students on systematization of pedagogical experiences in formative research training — related
• No significant overall change in CCT-X scores from pre-test to post-test regardless of group — related
• U-learning and E-learning groups were statistically equivalent at pretest before the intervention — related