Students using a U-learning environment significantly outperform E-learning students on systematization of pedagogical experiences in formative research training¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the systematization stage, the U-learning group obtained significantly higher mean scores than the E-learning control group (t=-3.58, p<.05). → Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017

Evidence¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa 2017¶

Cristian Velandia-Mesa, Francisca-José Serrano-Pastor, María-José Martínez-Segura. (2017). Formative Research in Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments in Higher Education. Comunicar, 51, XXV. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-01

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental chronological-series study with a non-equivalent control group; 96 U-learning students versus 93 E-learning students. The inter-group Student's T-test at the systematization stage was significant (t=–3.58, p<.05), with the U-learning group showing "the best average scores" and stable dispersion.

"The inter-groups analysis through Student's T-test confirms that such differences are significant between the E-learning and U-learning groups of students in the processes of systematization of the pedagogical experiences with (t=–3.58 y p<.05), being the one with the best average scores."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the analysis stage of formative research — related
• No significant difference between U-learning and E-learning groups in the referencing stage of formative research — related