Claims

No statistically significant difference in acquiring religious concepts attributed to students' gender

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The difference in acquiring religious concepts between male and female students was not statistically significant. → Khalid A. Alsoudi 2017

Evidence

Khalid A. Alsoudi 2017

Khalid A. Alsoudi. (2017). The Effect of Using K.W.L Strategy upon Acquiring Religious Concepts. World Journal of Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n2p31

q2 · i? · causal · r1

2-way ANOVA on post-test religious-concept scores of 139 students; Table 5 reports gender F = 0.45, sig 0.832. Descriptive means were "the females = 85.41, while the males mean = 82.00"; no effect size is printed, so the null is not an equivalence finding.

"The differences in means were not statistically significant (Table 5). This could be explained by the fact that parents usually encourage their sons to be highly achievers"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.