Claims

No statistically significant interaction between gender and teaching strategy on acquiring religious concepts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The gender-by-teaching-strategy interaction on acquiring religious concepts was not statistically significant, suggesting both males and females can apply K.W.L. → Khalid A. Alsoudi 2017

Evidence

Khalid A. Alsoudi 2017

Khalid A. Alsoudi. (2017). The Effect of Using K.W.L Strategy upon Acquiring Religious Concepts. World Journal of Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n2p31

q2 · i? · causal · r1

2-way ANOVA interaction term (Strategy*gender) on post-test scores in Table 5 reports F = 0.982, sig 0.324 for 139 8th-grade students; no effect size is printed for this omnibus interaction.

"it is found that the difference in means was not statistically significant, which means that both males and females can apply K.W.L easily and involve it in their learning"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.