Literacy achievement differences showed no statistically significant effect of gender or of the method-by-gender interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Neither reading nor writing achievement differed significantly by gender, nor by the interaction of gender and teaching method. → Al-Hajaya 2012
Evidence¶
Al-Hajaya 2012¶
Nail Al-hajaya. (2012). Impact of the Systemic Approach on Literacy Achievement of Jordanian 1st Graders at Mu'tah University Model School. International Education Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n1p100
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Two-way ANOVA on writing grades found no significant gender effect (p=0.395) and no significant method-by-gender interaction (p=0.8); the reading ANOVA likewise found no gender (p=0.689) or interaction (p=0.539) effect. No effect sizes are printed, so magnitudes are unreported.
"Table 5 shows statistically significant differences in student grades (M=16.0) on the writing test attributed to teaching method and in favor on the system approach, whereas no such differences were found can be attributable to gender or to interaction between gender and method."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- No statistically significant interaction between teaching method and gender was found on the post-test or follow-up test — related
- No statistically significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Arabic grammar achievement — related
- There is no significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Igbo language reading comprehension achievement — related
- Number relationships instruction shows no differential benefit by gender — related
- No statistically significant difference in reading achievement due to the interaction between gender and teaching strategy — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- No statistically significant interaction between teaching method and gender on post-achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.