Claims

No statistically significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Arabic grammar achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The gender-by-teaching-method interaction on achievement was not statistically significant (F = 3.366, p = 0.069), so the computerized program's advantage did not differ by gender as tested. → Al-Mashaqbeh and Neama 2015

Evidence

Al-Mashaqbeh and Neama 2015

Ibtesam Al-Mashaqbeh, Mushtak Neama. (2015). The Effect of Computerized Instructional Program in the Intermediate First Grade Students Achievement in Arabic language Grammar in Iraq. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083567

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA of the same 120-student quasi-experiment testing the Method X Gender interaction on grammar achievement; the article reports no statistically significant interaction, F = 3.366, p = 0.069, and notes the result agreed with the Soman (2006) study.

"there were no statistically significant differences (α = 0. 05) due to the impact of the interaction between the te aching method and gender as the value of "P" was (3.366) and a statistically significant difference was (0.069)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.