Claims

There is no significant interaction between teaching method and gender on Igbo language reading comprehension achievement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The interaction effect of gender and instructional approach on students' mean Igbo reading comprehension scores is not statistically significant, with the cloze approach superior at both gender levels. → Nneka Justina Eze 2015

Evidence

Nneka Justina Eze 2015

Nneka Justina Eze. (2015). Effects of Cloze Instructional Approach on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievement in Igbo Language Reading Comprehension. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079076

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Two-way ANCOVA (teaching methods and gender with interaction effect) on overall Igbo reading comprehension scores for both groups. The interaction F was 0.113 against a critical value of 3.92; the null hypothesis was upheld. Table 3 shows cloze adjusted means of 57.90 (males) and 54.38 (females) versus 45.00 and 39.58 under the conventional method.

"On the test of significance of interactions betwee n methods and gender on students mean achievement in Igbo language reading comprehension, summary of result in Table 4 shows that the F.calculated value (0.113) is less than the F.critical value (3.92) at the given alpha level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.