Claims

ERP amplitude shows larger negativity for incongruent and No-Go trials at frontal midline sites

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? ERP amplitude is more negative for incongruent than congruent trials and for No-Go than Go trials at frontal sites, with larger negativity at midline leads. → Checa 2011

Evidence

Checa 2011

Checa, P., & Rueda, M. R. (2011). Behavioral and Brain Measures of Executive Attention and School Competence in Late Childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2011.591857

q3 · i? · associational · r1

ERP ANOVAs in 27 children with usable EEG data from the combined Flanker-Go/No-Go task. The study reports "larger negative amplitude for incongruent ( −.8 μV) compared to congruent (.23 μV) trials" and larger negativity for No-Go (−3.4 μV) than Go (−2 μV) trials.

"For amplitude, the main effect of Flanker Type was significant ( F(1, 26) = 13.68; p < .001), indicating larger negative amplitude for incongruent ( −.8 μV) compared to congruent (.23 μV) trials."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id erp-amplitude-incongruent-nogo-frontal-negativity
title ERP amplitude shows larger negativity for incongruent and No-Go trials at frontal midline sites
description ERP amplitude shows larger negativity for incongruent and No-Go trials at frontal midline sites
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — checa-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.