Monolingual and bilingual children perform comparably on single-modality classification tasks in accuracy and speed¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For the single task, there were no significant effects of language group, modality, or their interaction on accuracy. → Bialystok Ellen 2011
q3 i? Reaction times showed no effect of language group in either single or dual conditions. → Bialystok Ellen 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Bialystok Ellen 2011¶
Bialystok Ellen. (2011). Coordination of Executive Functions in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139691/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Separate 2-way ANOVA on single-task accuracy in the same experiment with 63 children. "For the single task, there were no effects for any factor: language group, F (1, 61) = 1.86, n.s., modality, F (1, 61) = 1.44, n.s., or their interaction, F (1, 61) = 3.39, n.s."
"For the single task, there were no effects for any factor: language group, F (1, 61) = 1.86, n.s., modality, F (1, 61) = 1.44, n.s., or their interaction, F (1, 61) = 3.39, n.s."
Bialystok Ellen 2011 (2)¶
Bialystok Ellen. (2011). Coordination of Executive Functions in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139691/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
3-way ANOVA on reaction times for language group, condition, and modality. "There was no effect for language group, F < 1", so the bilingual accuracy advantage came with no speed cost.
"There was no effect for language group, F < 1."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Bilingual children maintain higher accuracy than monolingual children in a dual-modality classification task, with the advantage limited to the visual task — related
- Match trials are more accurate and faster than mismatch trials in the dual-modality task, with no language group difference — related
- The dual-task condition is more difficult than the single-task condition, with a condition-by-modality interaction in reaction time — related
- Bilingual children show no reaction time cost for their dual-task accuracy advantage — related
- More bilingual than monolingual children pass the 60% accuracy criterion on the visual dual-task, but not on the auditory dual-task — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-group-difference-single-modality-classification |
title |
Monolingual and bilingual children perform comparably on single-modality classification tasks in accuracy and speed |
description |
Monolingual and bilingual children perform comparably on single-modality classification tasks in accuracy and speed |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — bialystok-ellen-2011, bialystok-ellen-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.