More bilingual than monolingual children pass the 60% accuracy criterion on the visual dual-task, but not on the auditory dual-task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For visual responses, more bilinguals passed than monolinguals (χ2 (1) = 10.68, p < .001). → Bialystok Ellen 2011
q3 i? For auditory responses, the pass/fail distributions were not significantly different between groups. → Bialystok Ellen 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Bialystok Ellen 2011¶
Bialystok Ellen. (2011). Coordination of Executive Functions in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139691/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Pass/fail analysis using a 60% correct criterion (scores below were not different from chance) on dual-modality data. "For the visual responses (Table 3a), more bilinguals passed than monolinguals, χ2 (1) = 10.68, p < .001"; the auditory distributions did not differ.
"For the visual responses (Table 3a), more bilinguals passed than monolinguals, χ2 (1) = 10.68, p < .001, but for the auditory responses (Table 3b), the distributions were not significantly different, χ2 (1) = 2.23, p = .13"
Bialystok Ellen 2011 (2)¶
Bialystok Ellen. (2011). Coordination of Executive Functions in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139691/
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same pass/fail analysis applied to auditory responses in the dual-modality condition. "but for the auditory responses (Table 3b), the distributions were not significantly different, χ2 (1) = 2.23, p = .13".
"but for the auditory responses (Table 3b), the distributions were not significantly different, χ2 (1) = 2.23, p = .13"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Bilingual children maintain higher accuracy than monolingual children in a dual-modality classification task, with the advantage limited to the visual task — a broader claim this one bears on
- Monolingual and bilingual children perform comparably on single-modality classification tasks in accuracy and speed — related
- The dual-task condition is more difficult than the single-task condition, with a condition-by-modality interaction in reaction time — related
- Bilingual children show no reaction time cost for their dual-task accuracy advantage — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pass-fail-distribution-visual-auditory-dual-task |
title |
More bilingual than monolingual children pass the 60% accuracy criterion on the visual dual-task, but not on the auditory dual-task |
description |
More bilingual than monolingual children pass the 60% accuracy criterion on the visual dual-task, but not on the auditory dual-task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — bialystok-ellen-2011, bialystok-ellen-2011-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.