No significant group differences in motivation, accuracy, response time, or reading time between uncertain and certain groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Group effects were not significant on total reading time of explanations (t(138) = 0.40, p = 0.69), total response time (t(138) = 1.35, p = 0.18), motivation (t(138) = −0.60, p = 0.55), or accuracy (t(138) = 1.33, p = 0.19). → Ozcelik 2013

Evidence¶

Ozcelik 2013¶

Ozcelik, E., Ercil Cagiltay, N., & Sahin Ozcelik, N. (2013). The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers & Education, 67, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the randomized experiment, independent samples t-tests found "the group effect was not significant on total reading time of explanations" and response time, and "no significant difference in motivation between the groups"; accuracy likewise showed no difference (t(138) = 1.33, p = 0.19).

"It was found that the group effect was not significant on total reading time of explanations, t(138) ¼ 0.40, p ¼ 0.69 and the total response time to questions, t(138) ¼ 1.35, p ¼ 0.18. In addition, there was no significant difference in motivation between the groups, t(138) ¼/C0 0.60, p ¼ 0.55."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not — related
• Uncertainty in a game-like learning environment enhances post-test learning outcomes — related
• Post-test performance is positively associated with accuracy, response time, uncertainty, and motivation — related