Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Post-test correlated with total response time to questions (r = 0.27), accuracy (r = 0.37), and motivation (r = 0.22), but not with total reading time of explanations (r = 0.10). → Ozcelik 2013
q2 i2 Motivation correlated positively with accuracy (r = 0.31) and response time (r = 0.19), but not with reading time of explanations. → Ozcelik 2013
Evidence¶
Ozcelik 2013¶
Ozcelik, E., Ercil Cagiltay, N., & Sahin Ozcelik, N. (2013). The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers & Education, 67, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
Pearson correlation analyses (n = 140) on the game experiment's behavioral measures found "higher total response time to the questions, accuracy, and motivation were correlated with higher post-test scores"; Table 4 prints r = 0.27, r = 0.37, and r = 0.22 respectively, while reading time was not significant (r = 0.10).
"The higher total response time to the questions, accuracy, and motivation were correlated with higher post-test scores. However, the correlation between the total reading time of explanations and the post-test found not to be statistically significant."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Post-test scores correlate with motivation, response time, reading time and in-game accuracy — reports the opposite
- Path analysis supports an indirect path from competition through motivation and in-game accuracy to post-test scores — related
- No significant group differences in motivation, accuracy, response time, or reading time between uncertain and certain groups — related
- Motivation is positively related to accuracy and response time during game-based learning — related
- Post-test performance is positively associated with accuracy, response time, uncertainty, and motivation — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
correlations-post-test-behavioral-measures |
title |
Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not |
description |
Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ozcelik-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.