Claims

Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Post-test correlated with total response time to questions (r = 0.27), accuracy (r = 0.37), and motivation (r = 0.22), but not with total reading time of explanations (r = 0.10). → Ozcelik 2013 q2 i2 Motivation correlated positively with accuracy (r = 0.31) and response time (r = 0.19), but not with reading time of explanations. → Ozcelik 2013

Evidence

Ozcelik 2013

Ozcelik, E., Ercil Cagiltay, N., & Sahin Ozcelik, N. (2013). The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers & Education, 67, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Pearson correlation analyses (n = 140) on the game experiment's behavioral measures found "higher total response time to the questions, accuracy, and motivation were correlated with higher post-test scores"; Table 4 prints r = 0.27, r = 0.37, and r = 0.22 respectively, while reading time was not significant (r = 0.10).

"The higher total response time to the questions, accuracy, and motivation were correlated with higher post-test scores. However, the correlation between the total reading time of explanations and the post-test found not to be statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id correlations-post-test-behavioral-measures
title Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not
description Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ozcelik-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.