Post-test performance is positively associated with accuracy, response time, uncertainty, and motivation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The post-test was positively associated with accuracy (t = 3.75), response time (t = 2.55), uncertainty (t = 2.17), and motivation (t = 1.29), supporting H4–H7. → Ozcelik 2013

Evidence¶

Ozcelik 2013¶

Ozcelik, E., Ercil Cagiltay, N., & Sahin Ozcelik, N. (2013). The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments. Computers & Education, 67, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The path analysis of the experiment's data showed "the post-test was positively associated with accuracy", response time, uncertainty, and motivation, supporting hypotheses H4 through H7. The model accounted for 20% of the variance in post-test scores.

"The post-test was positively associated with accuracy (t ¼ 3.75), response time (t ¼ 2.55), uncertainty (t ¼ 2.17), and motivation (t ¼ 1.29), all of which support H4, H5, H6, and H7, respectively."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Higher response time, accuracy, and motivation correlate with higher post-test scores; reading time of explanations does not — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Post-test scores correlate with motivation, response time, reading time and in-game accuracy — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Uncertainty is positively associated with learner motivation in game-like environments — related
• Path analysis supports an indirect path from competition through motivation and in-game accuracy to post-test scores — related
• No significant group differences in motivation, accuracy, response time, or reading time between uncertain and certain groups — related
• Uncertainty in a game-like learning environment enhances post-test learning outcomes — related