No significant interaction between writing task and prompts on integration measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? There was no significant interaction effect between the writing task and prompts factors. → Lehmann 2019
Evidence¶
Lehmann 2019¶
Lehmann, T., Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2019). Fostering integrated mental models of different professional knowledge domains: instructional approaches and model-based analyses. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09704-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
The omnibus MANOVA on 92 participants found no significant interaction between the two factors, "Wilks' λ = .969, F(2,87) = 1.396".
"No significant interaction effect was found, Wilks' λ = .969, F(2,87) = 1.396, p > .05, ηp2 = .031."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Argument writing tasks show no effect on structural or semantic integration of knowledge across professional domains — related
- Prompts have a significant multivariate main effect on combined structural and semantic integration measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-interaction-writing-task-prompts |
title |
No significant interaction between writing task and prompts on integration measures |
description |
No significant interaction between writing task and prompts on integration measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lehmann-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.