Male and female WM growth trajectories do not differ: sex-by-age interactions are non-significant after multiple-comparison correction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Biological sex × age interaction coefficients for forward and backward digit span growth were non-significant in the full PSID-CDS and in the ECLS-K:2011 after correction. → Ahmed 2022
Evidence¶
Ahmed 2022¶
Ahmed, S. F., Ellis, A., Ward, K. P., Chaku, N., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2022). Working memory development from early childhood to adolescence using two nationally representative samples. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001396
q3 · i? · associational · r3
Robustness check interacting biological sex with age in the PSID-CDS cubic models; "non-significant interaction coefficients" for both tasks (p = .217 and p = .224). The ECLS-K:2011 interaction (b = −0.520, p = .041) was also non-significant after Bonferroni correction.
"We observed non-significant interaction coefficients for the cubic functional form of the Forward Digit Span (b = 0.001, SE = .001, p = .217; see Figure 3) and Backward Digit Span (b = 0.001, SE = .001, p = .224; see Figure 3) in the full PSID-CDS dataset."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Sex-specific subgroup models show the same functional forms for boys and girls, though cubic coefficients for boys were not significant after correction — related
- Verbal working memory shows non-linear growth from ages 3–19, with the most rapid growth during childhood and a brief accelerated period during early adolescence — related
- When PSID-CDS data are restricted to ages 6–11, backward digit span growth is best characterized by a quadratic (not cubic) function — related
- Female children and adolescents recognize vocal emotions more accurately than males, with no interaction between sex and age — related
- Cool executive function measures show ascending age-related growth across adolescence, with a growth spurt around age 14–15 — related
- The simulation advantage and interest differences hold across subgroups of age, gender, school form, and grade — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-sex-differences-wm-growth |
title |
Male and female WM growth trajectories do not differ: sex-by-age interactions are non-significant after multiple-comparison correction |
description |
Male and female WM growth trajectories do not differ: sex-by-age interactions are non-significant after multiple-comparison correction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ahmed-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.