Sex-specific subgroup models show the same functional forms for boys and girls, though cubic coefficients for boys were not significant after correction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Subgroup analyses found the same best-fitting functional forms for boys and girls, with some boys' cubic coefficients non-significant after Bonferroni correction. → Ahmed 2022
Evidence¶
Ahmed 2022¶
Ahmed, S. F., Ellis, A., Ward, K. P., Chaku, N., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2022). Working memory development from early childhood to adolescence using two nationally representative samples. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001396
q3 · i? · associational · r3
Sex subgroup analyses on the full PSID-CDS age range: cubic fit best for both sexes, but "the cubic coefficient was not statistically significant for boys after adjusting for multiple comparisons" for forward span (p = .005) and backward span (p = .035); girls' coefficients were significant.
"However, the cubic coefficient was not statistically significant for boys after adjusting for multiple comparisons (girls: b = 0.002, p < .001; boys: b = 0.001, p = .005)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Male and female WM growth trajectories do not differ: sex-by-age interactions are non-significant after multiple-comparison correction — related
- Verbal working memory shows non-linear growth from ages 3–19, with the most rapid growth during childhood and a brief accelerated period during early adolescence — a broader claim this one bears on
- Functional coupling development during inhibition is sex-specific: striatal-motor coupling increases with age in girls, frontostriatal coupling increases with age in boys — related
- The simulation advantage and interest differences hold across subgroups of age, gender, school form, and grade — related
- When PSID-CDS data are restricted to ages 6–11, backward digit span growth is best characterized by a quadratic (not cubic) function — related
- ACE-outcome associations did not differ between girls and boys — related
- No sex difference in the effect of drill on arithmetic improvement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sex-subgroup-functional-forms-similar |
title |
Sex-specific subgroup models show the same functional forms for boys and girls, though cubic coefficients for boys were not significant after correction |
description |
Sex-specific subgroup models show the same functional forms for boys and girls, though cubic coefficients for boys were not significant after correction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ahmed-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.