Claims

Effect sizes of CRE, PE and PM programs do not differ significantly by education program, though peace education showed the largest point estimate (g = 1.892)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group heterogeneity in effect sizes by program type was not statistically significant (Q = 1.460 below the critical value of 5.991), despite peace education's larger point estimate. → Fulya Turk 2017

Evidence

Fulya Turk 2017

Fulya Turk. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Conflict Resolution, Peace Education and Peer Mediation: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Education Studies; Vol. 11, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p25

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis across the 23 meta-analyzed studies comparing conflict resolution (8 studies), peace education (4) and peer mediation (11). Peace education showed the largest point estimate, "a value of g= 1,892", but the program comparison was not statistically significant (Q = 1.460 < 5.991).

"the effect size values for studies in which peace edu cation programs have been used are greater in comparison with the other education programs with a value of g= 1,892"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.