Claims

Effect sizes do not differ significantly between selected-student and whole-class applications, with class-based applications slightly higher (g = 1.253 vs 1.245)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group heterogeneity by application type was not statistically significant (Q = 0.001 below the critical value of 3.841); class-based and selected-student applications had nearly identical point estimates. → Fulya Turk 2017

Evidence

Fulya Turk 2017

Fulya Turk. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Conflict Resolution, Peace Education and Peer Mediation: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Education Studies; Vol. 11, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p25

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis comparing applications delivered to selected students (12 studies, g = 1.245) versus whole-class delivery (11 studies, g = 1.253). The difference was not statistically significant (Q = 0.001 < 3.841).

"the effect size of the applications carried out as a class (g= 1.253) is greater . However, the difference between the effect sizes is not statistically significant since the Q=0,001 value is below the critical value of 3.841"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.