Claims

No significant longitudinal changes in SV2A tracer binding in six visuomotor VOIs after four weeks of motor learning, and no associations between SV2A binding and learning progress

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Neither GROUP, TIMING nor their interaction significantly influenced SUVR in any VOI. → Hehl 2026 q3 i? No correlations were found between baseline or change in SUVR and BTT training progress, pooled or per group. → Hehl 2026 (2)

Evidence

Hehl 2026

Hehl, M., Toyonaga, T., Carson, R. E., Dupont, P., Van Laere, K., Swinnen, S. P. & Cuypers, K. (2026). No significant changes in synaptic density and gray matter volume following motor learning—a pilot study. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00451-5

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Linear mixed models per VOI on [18F]SynVesT-1 SUVR (PRE vs POST) in the 22-participant pilot, with SUBJECT as random effect and GROUP and TIMING as fixed effects. No main effects or interaction reached significance in any of the six visuomotor VOIs.

"Neither GROUP, nor TIMING, nor their interaction significantly influenced SUVR in any of the VOIs (main effect TIMING: all,p > 0.23)"

Hehl 2026 (2)

Hehl, M., Toyonaga, T., Carson, R. E., Dupont, P., Van Laere, K., Swinnen, S. P. & Cuypers, K. (2026). No significant changes in synaptic density and gray matter volume following motor learning—a pilot study. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00451-5

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Correlation analyses between baseline SUVR or SUVR change and BTT training progress in the same pilot. For both groups pooled, all p > 0.24 and |r| < 0.26; per group, all p > 0.17 and |r| < 0.45. No effect sizes were reported as significant.

"There were no correlations between SUVRPRE and BTT training progress"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id no-sv2a-binding-changes-motor-learning
title No significant longitudinal changes in SV2A tracer binding in six visuomotor VOIs after four weeks of motor learning, and no associations between SV2A binding and learning progress
description No significant longitudinal changes in SV2A tracer binding in six visuomotor VOIs after four weeks of motor learning, and no associations between SV2A binding and learning progress
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hehl-2026, hehl-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.