No significant treatment-by-intelligence interaction on physics concept understanding¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The interaction between treatment and intelligence had no significant influence on physics concept understanding (F = .15, not significant). → Kumar 2013

Evidence¶

Kumar 2013¶

Kumar, A., & Mathur, M. (2013). Effect of Concept Attainment Model on Acquisition of Physics Concepts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010304

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Interaction term from the treatment x intelligence ANCOVA: "The adjusted F-value for interaction between treatment and intelligence is .15, which is not significant". The null hypothesis was not rejected; equivalence was not tested.

"The adjusted F-value for interaction between treatment and intelligence is .15, which is not significant. It indicates that there was no significant influence of the resultant of interaction between the treatment and intelligence"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

General Cognitive Ability — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it

Page metadata

Field	Value
`status`	`review`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-11-02`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.