No significant treatment-by-gender interaction on physics concept understanding¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The interaction between treatment and gender had no significant influence on physics concept understanding (F = .026, not significant). → Kumar 2013

Evidence¶

Kumar 2013¶

Kumar, A., & Mathur, M. (2013). Effect of Concept Attainment Model on Acquisition of Physics Concepts. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010304

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Interaction term from the 2x2 factorial ANCOVA: "The adjusted F-value for interaction between gender and treatment is .026, which is not significant". The null hypothesis was not rejected; equivalence was not tested.

"The adjusted F-value for interaction between gender and treatment is .026, which is not significant. It indicates that there was no significant influence of the resultant of interaction between the treatment and gender"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Treatment effect on physics concept understanding holds in 2x2 factorial ANCOVA controlling pretest only — related
• No significant treatment-by-intelligence interaction on physics concept understanding — related
• Male and female students show no significant difference in understanding of Light waves — related
• No significant gender difference in performance among undergraduates exposed to e-learning — related
• ISIA effects showed no significant main effects of sex, but significant treatment-by-sex interactions for conceptual understanding and confidence — reports the opposite
• Method-by-gender interaction is significant only for application of Light waves, not for understanding or analysis — related