The relationship between student characteristics and achievement does not differ significantly by academic area, cultural context, publication bias status, research quality, report type, or publication year¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Six moderator variables showed non-significant differences in effect sizes (p = 0.09, 0.23, 0.32, 0.18, 0.74, and 0.195 respectively). → Erdem Cahit 2026
Evidence¶
Erdem Cahit 2026¶
Erdem Cahit, Kaya Metin, Polat Mustafa, Eğmir Eray. (2026). Thinking and feeling matter: a second-order meta-analysis of student characteristics across developmental domains and their effect on academic outcomes. BMC Psychology, 14, 919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05035-x
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Moderator analyses across the 71-effect-size data set found no statistically significant differences for academic area, cultural context, publication bias status, research quality, report type, or publication year; equivalence was not tested. Only school level and characteristic type were significant moderators.
"Finally, the distribution of effect sizes did not differ significantly in terms of academic area, cultural context, publication bias status, research quality, research report type, and publication year variables (see Table 2, p = 0.09, p = 0.23, p = 0.32, p = 0.18, p = 0.74, and p = 195, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The effect of cooperative learning did not differ statistically by teaching style, outcome type, publication quality, bias status, or report type — related
- No coded study characteristics moderated the emotion–political learning associations in Bayesian regularized meta-analysis — related
- Sample characteristics (immigrant/minority status, L2 status, age) show no significant moderator effects, and several program and delivery features are also nonsignificant — related
- Review findings are consistent across study design features; no moderator showed meaningful relationships — related
- Writing intervention effects for US ELL students do not vary significantly by study quality indicators, participant characteristics, or intervention characteristics — related
- Most study characteristics (publication year, mean age, sampling, target language, L2 major, proficiency, measure, mode) do not significantly moderate the gender gap — related
- Several candidate moderators show no reliable effects: retention interval, test type, presentation mode, and publication status — related
- SES–learning effect sizes did not differ by SES indicator or outcome type in an umbrella review's meta-regressions; differences by grade level and study year rested on one or two effect sizes — related
- Student characteristics across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains show a medium-level overall relationship with K-12 academic achievement (r = 0.26) — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.