No coded study characteristics moderated the emotion–political learning associations in Bayesian regularized meta-analysis¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Bayesian regularized moderator analyses including sample size, publication status, discipline, country, sampling, measurement type, state vs. trait, object focus, discrete emotion, and learning category identified no relevant moderators of the emotion–learning associations. → Elisabeth Graf 2024

Evidence¶

Elisabeth Graf 2024¶

Elisabeth Graf, Johanna L. Donath, Elouise Botes, Martin Voracek, Thomas Goetz. (2024). The Associations Between Discrete Emotions and Political Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09893-y

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Exploratory Bayesian regularized meta-analysis (BRMA with horseshoe priors, three-level mixed effects models) of coded study descriptors as moderators; the article reports it "could not identify any relevant moderator from the included variables". An additional cognitive-versus-behavioral learning-outcome dummy also showed no significant effects.

"As shown in Table H1, we could not identify any relevant moderator from the included variables."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Sample characteristics (immigrant/minority status, L2 status, age) show no significant moderator effects, and several program and delivery features are also nonsignificant — related
• Program and delivery characteristics moderate SEL effects: implementation quality, duration, skill practice, and delivery agent — related
• The effect of cooperative learning did not differ statistically by teaching style, outcome type, publication quality, bias status, or report type — related
• Review findings are consistent across study design features; no moderator showed meaningful relationships — related
• A meta-analysis found no evidence that clinical status, including ADHD and substance use disorder samples, moderates the effect of reward on inhibitory control — related
• Demographic moderators (child gender, parent gender, ethnicity, sample type, socio-economic status) show limited moderating effects on the self-efficacy–partnership association — related
• Class size, course level, and discipline did not explain significant variation in how achievement gaps changed under active learning — related
• Most study, measurement, and intervention moderators did not explain significant variance in SRL intervention effect sizes — related
• Age, gender, developmental status, SES, and sample region do not significantly moderate the inhibitory control–mathematical ability correlation — related
• Most study characteristics (publication year, mean age, sampling, target language, L2 major, proficiency, measure, mode) do not significantly moderate the gender gap — related